The Sublime
Most dragons don’t believe
people exist. But there are a few who do, and they gaze strongly at us.
What do they see?
Tradition
depicts dragons in caves keeping close watch over beautiful maidens or mounds
of gold. Legend suggests that dragons have no use for either. But this is not
true.
Dragons
use treasure to attract people. The cave in which real dragons dwell is the
human skull. And the treasure they hoard is indeed beautiful maidens and heaped
gold—because those are the two treasures that inspire
the strongest fantasies in homo sapiens, from deep in the reptile root of our
brain: desire and power. Do we ever tell ourselves stories about anything else?
As
you might expect from the millennia they’ve been hoarding those treasures most
useful to us—and watching us strive for them with all our hominid strength and
cunning—the dragons who see us know a lot about human nature: especially the
sensuous intensity of human desire.
And
what do they see?
Our
span so brief, our self-awareness so keen, we inspire in dragons feelings both
tragic and reverent, the two essential ingredients for the sublime. Dragons are
fascinated at an extraordinary depth by the poetry of human life.
In
1905, Lord Dunsany published The Book of
Wonder, a collection that includes “Miss
Cubbidge and the Dragon of Romance.” It tells of a dragon that steals away a
maiden and keeps her as a treasure. The treasure, in fact, is the story itself—a lyrical
allegory for the timeless wonder of fantasy, the creative enterprise of the
sublime, which our factory-world calls escapism:
Out
of the balcony of her father's house in Prince of Wales' Square, the painted
dark-green balcony that grew blacker every year, the dragon lifted Miss
Cubbidge and spread his rattling wings, and London fell away like an old fashion. And England fell
away, and the smoke of its factories, and the round material world that goes
humming round the sun vexed and pursued by time, until there appeared the
eternal and ancient lands of Romance lying low by mystical seas. [ … ] The tide
roamed on and whispered of mastery and of myth, while near that captive lady,
asleep in his marble tank the golden dragon dreamed: and a little way out from
the coast all that the dragon dreamed showed faintly in the mist that lay over
the sea. He never dreamed of any rescuing knight. So long as he dreamed, it was
twilight; but when he came up nimbly out of his tank night fell and starlight
glistened on the dripping, golden scales. There he and his captive either
defeated Time or never encountered him at all.
I
like how Lord D identifies the lands of Romance as both eternal and ancient:
synonyms for the two necessary components of the sublime: Ancient expresses the
long-gone, the tragic—and eternity is timeless,
transcendent, worthy of reverence.
And what do you make of
Dunsany’s observation that the mystical sea whispers of mastery and myth? There
is kinship between those two, isn’t there? To err is human, and so mastery is
an ideal for us, a myth. Striving for mastery is a large part of our legend
among dragons.
When they come to Earth out of
imaginary time questing for us, most of the time they don’t actually believe they’re
going to find us. Their search is just a lark. Even those few dragons that know
we exist have rarely observed an individual human life. We’re too fleeting. The
exceptional dragons with the curiosity and ingenuity to notice us try not to
blink. Some hoard treasure to attract us and get a fix on our speed-blur lives.
And
what do they see?
Turns
out, it’s not so much what dragons see as what they’re looking for. They are
creatures of the far beyond. They come from ranges remote to human experience.
And when they show up here, where we notice them, they are looking for us.
2 Comments:
Hi Al - are you familiar with John Howe? He's an artist who, along with Alan Lee, is best known for shaping the overall look of Peter Jackson's LORD OF THE RINGS film trilogy. In the 'making of' portions of the dvds, Howe rather looks like he himself could have played Saruman as a youngish man (if Saruman was ever young). Anyway, he has a book called FORGING DRAGONS, which is full of his artwork and, almost more interesting to me, his musings on the various strains of dragon-hood throughout world myth and how best to depict them. Of course, as a visual artist, he has to pin those beasts to paper in more concrete terms than you do in prose. Words on the page can transcend the visual, it seems to me, so that for a reader a creature abiding by 'mystical seas (in the)...eternal and ancient lands of Romance' can be concrete and fully formed in the mind's eye without niggling questions of "What does it look like?" and "How big is it?"
Thanks, Jaime, for pointing out Howe and Lee. I found interviews with them at YouTube and lots of their vivid imagery online. They complement each other well, it seems: Lee is soulful, haunted even, and Howe captures spirited freezeframes of action. They’re masterful hunters of the transcendental, aren’t they? When a visual artist depicts a dragon, we see a whisper of eternity in the sudden world. The dragon exists right there, in front of our eyes! We recognize with blood memory the saurian contours and predatory stare. But it doesn’t move. Its stillness veers into a higher dimension, orthogonal to time. Illuminating!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home